‘Truth’ Editor Accuses Paul Holmes Of Buying Drugs.
tumeke.co.nz
I am sure he must have evidence to have stated this.
‘Herald On Sunday’ And ‘Spy’ Now Loves Sally Ridge
bipolarbear.co.nz
My Gods, the ‘Herald on Sunday’ is bi-polar. For the last several years whilst self loather Rachel Glacouma has been doing ‘Spy’, their cheap and always nasty gossip insert, they would have had us believe sally ridge was a shit mother with a huge sexual appetite and no morals and a shit life. Every piece written on the lady was nasty and full of innuendo and cruelty. Now that the cutter has been moved to write about politicians for the weekday Herald, which just shows how disgusting Granny herald has become it allows that creature to write about politics like she has a clue, suddenly ‘Spy’ seems to love Sally. They had a story about how Kiwis are chomping at the bit to watch her show. It seems strange as their view for the last decade has been that Sally is a disgusting cunt. Seems strange now they are singing her praises and are convinced the country want her show. Here are the best bits of mindreading from whatever hack ‘writes’ for them now……
Don’t even try to act like you’re not interested in the Ridges.
One online story on Sally and Jaime Ridge’s proposed reality show attracted a staggering 600 comments, irrefutable proof that people do care – one way or the other.
My guess is that the show will go ahead. Reality TV is a ratings winner, and Sally and Jaime are lightning rods for everything that we love/hate about contemporary celebrity culture.
My advice to TV3 is to strike while the iron is hot. Green means go!
I know tabloids are rather new in New Zealand, but could the editors and writers for the ‘H.O.S.’ remember that when you hate someone, and especially when you pour such vitriol and hate on her for years, the ‘Road to Damascus’ change does not work nor is believable.
Rachel Glucina Gone From ‘The Herald On Sunday’.
gpforums.co.nz
“Herald on Sunday’s…Spy gossip column is not far away from returning…but Glucina will not be a part of it.” HoS p.2
THAT IS FROM THE HERALD ON SUNDAY. GOOD RIDDANCE TO NASTY RUBBISH. TAKE YOUR PILLS RACHEL, YOU MESSED UP CREATURE. AND TRY TO LIKE YOURSELF MORE. AND H.O.S. DO NOT STOOP THAT FAR AGAIN TO FILL PAGES.
French Law Forbids News From Mentioning Facebook, Twitter But Can Source Stories From Them.
techfreakstuff.com
DAMN, I THOUGHT THEY WERE BANNED FROM EVEN GETTING STORIES FROM THEM. YOU KNOW, LIKE THE STORIES WE FIND IN OUR PAPERS EVERY SUNDAY THAT ARE MORE TRYING TO MAKE A STORY THAN BREAK ONE…..
French television anchors are banned from mentioning specific social networking sites unless a story is about them die to a 1992 law, highlighting the difficulty of legislating in the Internet age.
The host of a news or talk show is not allowed to say, “Follow us on Twitter at” or “See our Facebook page,” because such statements fall afoul of a law intended to prevent product placement-type advertising. Instead, anchors must use generic terms like, “Find us on popular social networking sites.”“Why give preference to Facebook, which is worth billions of dollars, when there are many other social networks that are struggling for recognition?” said Christine Kelly, spokesperson for France’s broadcast standards regulator, about the May 27 ruling.
In a world in which virtually all traditional media is increasingly interconnected with new media, especially social networking, the application of the law seems to put French broadcast networks at a disadvantage.
The situation also illustrates the difficulties of applying pre-Internet regulations to a post-Internet landscape. The well-intentioned 1992 law seeks to ensure that broadcast media — largely publicly funded in France and with strict advertising rules — is kept independent from marketing.
But lawmakers in the early 90s could never have imagined that private companies would, some 20 years later, become essential parts of the media conversation.
This application of the long-standing law has reportedly been widely criticized in the French blogosphere.
You Make One Holocaust Joke, Raybon Kan – And The Main Stream Media Go Crazy.
comedyfestival.co.nz
SO ONCE AGAIN THE ‘HERALD ON SUNDAY’ IS TRYING TO CREATE A STORY OUT OF THE HOLOCAUST. YOU MAY REMEMBER THEY TRIED AND FAILED TO NAIL DAVE FANE FOR THIS SUPPOSED ‘WAR CRIME’ LAST YEAR.
SO RAYBON KAN TWEETED THIS………
“Maybe adidas should run Auckland public transport. Nice German company. They should know how to load thousands on to trains.”
THE HERALD THEN TRIES TO CREATE CONTROVERSY WHERE NONE IS……..
When asked to explain what he meant, Kan said: “Oh, it’s just a joke about World War II. Well, you know, it’s just a Nazi joke. It’s a joke in the context of all the transport issues that were happening.
“I’m not a politician, I’m a comedian,” he added.
About six million Jewish people were killed under Germany’s Nazi regime. Many died on crowded trains on the way to concentration camps.
Kan said he had not had any complaints. “You’re looking for offence that hasn’t happened. I invite those people to email me,” he said.
WITH ALL ELSE FAILING, THEY GO TO THAT OLD STANDBY, THE ANGRY JEW……….
The comment, uploaded to Twitter, brought back painful memories for the Jewish community. “It’s quite sad that Raybon is referring to a tragic event like the Holocaust. He’s crossed the line,” Wellington Council of Christians and Jews secretary Dave Moskovitz said.
Kan’s comment was equally unfair to the citizens of modern Germany, he added. “I usually find Raybon quite funny. It’s disappointing. There really isn’t anything funny about the Holocaust. Raybon has missed the mark this time.”
The tweet, posted online on Wednesday, remained last night but Kan added an extra message to those who subscribe to his newsfeed: “Twitter is an open forum of back and forth, but if I don’t know you’ve been upset, I can’t respond, apologise or delete. Cheers.”
New Zealand Jewish Council chairman Stephen Goodman said Kan belonged to a generation that had not dealt with the harsh realities of the Holocaust.
“But ignorance is not an excuse to trivialise what happened,” he said.
Adidas public relations manager Sherryl Arneil said: “I don’t think we need to dignify that with a response.”
WELL, THE BROTHERS WHO STARTED ADIDAS WERE BOTH NATIONAL SOCIALISTS. AND THE JOKE SEEMS MORE ABOUT TAKING THE PISS OUT OF ADIDAS, RATHER THAN THE HOLOCAUST. IF HE HAD WANTED TO REALLY OFFEND THE JEWISH COMMUNITY HE COULD HAVE MADE JOKES ABOUT HOW ISRAEL WAS CREATED THROUGH TERRORISM WITH THE BOMBING OF THE STAR OF DAVID HOTEL……
On July 22, 1946, the south-western corner of the hotel was blown up by the militant Zionist group the Irgun. 91 people died and 45 people were injured. An earlier attempt by the Irgun to attack the hotel was foiled when the Haganah learned of it and warned the British authorities.
OR HE COULD HAVE JUST MADE A REAL JOKE ABOUT HOW AFTER THOUSANDS OF YEARS OF OPPRESSION, THE JEWS FINALLY GET THEIR OWN COUNTRY AND WHAT DO THEY DO?? TORTURE AND PERSECUTE ANOTHER RACE. HAVE THEY LEARNT NOTHING??????
AND ‘HERALD ON SUNDAY, STOP TRYING TO CREATE MOTHER FUCKING STORIES OFF SOCIAL MEDIA. USELESS.
Loading ...
Comments