entertainment weekly

Idiots At ‘Entertainment Weakly’ Get ‘The Gay Issue’ Wrong Again.

ew.com

These modern actors have never been in the closet. the MSM have just not known how to cover them as they have no way of knowing how to cover out stars. They were never asked, or publicists told ‘journalists’ not to ask.

Even if it’s accomplished in a subordinate clause or a passing reference, coming out casually is, in its way, as activist as DeGeneres’ Time cover, although few of these actors would probably choose to label themselves as such. The current vibe for discussing one’s sexuality is almost defiantly mellow: This is part of who I am, I don’t consider it a big deal or a crisis, and if you do, that’s not my problem. It may sound like a shrug, but it shouldn’t be mistaken for indifference. By daring anyone to overreact, the newest generation of gay public figures is making a clear statement that there is a “new normal” — and it consists of being plainspoken, clear, and truthful about who you are.

Well, kinda ignores the media being complicit with keeping stars in the closet. Ignores how EW is openly hostile to Out entertainers and bash them for living a gay lifestyle.Ignores how gay media are open how they are not allowed to bring up the ‘private lives’ of stars such as Matt Bomer and Jim Parsons. Ignores that their own publication happily allowed Anderson Cooper to chat happily about his brothers suicide and fathers issues, but ignored that he loves cock in his ass.

CRAP TIME WARNER.

EW – Do Not Dress A Woman Up As Divine – THAT SCREWS UP THE POINT.

ew.com

Check out Melissa McCarthy’s homage to the queen of all drag queens from our photo shoot; see more in new issue of Entertainment Weekly mag!

matthewhunt.com

SEE MORE? NO THANKS. HOW STUPID TO DRESS MELISSA UP AS THE GREATEST DRAG QUEEN OF ALL TIME. IT JUST MAKES NO SENSE TO ME AT ALL. CANNOT REALLY IMAGINE MELISSA DOING THIS…….

…….OR PINK FLAMINGOS BEING MADE NOWADAYS.

‘Star Trek’ Producer Talks Why There Were No Gay People In The 25th Century…..

lightspeedfineart.com

After Elton talks to pussy Brannon Braga. He really should have just said, ‘We really fucked up’…….

AE: I’m very much a fan of Star Trek but unfortunately none of the series ever included a gay character. You were involved with writing two of the movies and produced or executive produced for The Next Generation, Voyager and Enterprise. Can you speak to why that never happened?

BB: It was a shame for a lot of us that … I’m talking about the Next Generation, Deep Space Nine and there was a constant back and forth about well how do we portray the spectrum of sexuality. There were people who felt very strongly that we should be showing casually, you know, just two guys together in the background in Ten Forward. At the time the decision was made not to do that and I think those same people would make a different decision now because I think, you know, that was 1989, well yeah about 89, 90, 91. I have no doubt that those same creative players wouldn’t feel so hesitant to have, you know, have been squeamish about a decision like that.

AE: Why do you think science fiction, given that it’s so much forward looking, has done so poorly when it comes to being inclusive on American television?

BB: You know what’s funny is it was dealt with more metaphorically. Next Generation did a couple episodes you could say … I worked on one for Deep Space Nine with Dax. I don’t know if I can speak to the whole genre of science fiction, certainly the Star Trek franchise as it existed at the time.

AE: Do you think 20 years ago there was a reluctance to do it because science fiction, wrongly or rightly, is perceived as being for young straight males? Were you guys concerned about that?

BB: I think it was, not so much a young man’s [issue], it was a syndicated family show, showing at six o’clock, you know, in Salt Lake City, so you had to deal with each separate affiliate rather than one network. And things like that.

It was not a forward thinking decision. Knowing the players involved, knowing the decision makers, knowing it was that they felt reluctant about, you know, we’re not saying “yes,” we’re not saying “no,” we’re not just not going to touch that right now.

AE: Do you think if the next iteration of the series or movie doesn’t go there, do gay fans have a right to be really upset at this point? After all this, if it still doesn’t go there in 2011 0r 2012…

BB: Well, I mean, the movie is such a different bird. If there were a TV series, I would agree with you. But for a movie, I personally wouldn’t. With a TV series you’re creating a whole world, you’re creating a whole. You were saying, if this is going to last for five years, and if you don’t go there, then yes you got some questions. A two-hour movie and you’re sitting there and you’re eating your popcorn, if doesn’t fit … if it’s not part of the story, it’s not part of the story. There are many things that aren’t part of the story, you know? That’s my personal opinion.

Topics

Popular

Poll

Who is your favourite Drag Queen?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...