NYC Health Officials Still Trying To Get Orthodox Jewish Parents To Stop Rabbis Sucking Blood From Their Sons Circumcised Penis’s.
New York City health officials are pushing a proposed regulation that would require parents to sign a consent waiver before they take part in a circumcision ritual called “metzitzah b’peh,” typically practiced by ultra-Orthodox Jews. The ritual potentially poses a fatal risk to newborns, according to the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.
The legislation was proposed at a Board of Health meeting last month by Dr. Jay K. Varma, deputy commissioner for disease control for New York City’s health department, after 11 infants contracted neonatal herpes between November 2000 and December 2011, after the circumcision ritual. Two of the infants died.
Jews regularly practice circumcision as part of their religion, but mostly ultra-Orthodox Jews practice metzitzah b’peh, during which the mohel, or person performing the procedure, orally sucks the blood from the infant’s newly circumcised penis.
A statement issued last month by the New York City Health Department notes that ten of the children who contracted herpes after the metzitzah b’peh were hospitalized. Of the eight who survived, two suffer from permanent brain damage. Approximately 2,000 infants per year undergo the metzitzah b’peh in New York City.
The Department of Health is accepting public comments on the proposed regulation until a public hearing July 23. At the hearing, there will be a public forum where the board will consider all comments and make a final vote September 13.
Good. Finally some logical thinking, and giving ownership of bodies back to children. GOOD MOVE GERMANY.
A German court has outlawed circumcision for non-medical reasons.
Circumcisions of young boys on religious grounds should be considered as grievous bodily harm, a German court has said, in a landmark ruling that clears up a grey area for doctors. The regional court in Cologne, western Germany, ruled that the “fundamental right of the child to bodily integrity outweighed the fundamental rights of the parents.” “The religious freedom of the parents and their right to educate their child would not be unacceptably compromised, if they were obliged to wait until the child could himself decide to be circumcised,” the court added. The case was brought against a doctor in Cologne, who had circumcised a four-year-old Muslim boy on his parents’ wishes. The doctor was later charged with grievous bodily harm but acquitted by a lower court which judged he had acted within the law as the parents had given their consent.
Jewish and Muslim groups are outraged.
“The Court’s decision is unacceptable and gravely violates religious freedom,” says Rabbi Aryeh Goldberg, vice president of the Rabbinical Center of Europe. “The decision is contrary to human rights charter of the European Union, to which the German legal system is committed, and undermines the basic right to worship in the German Constitution.”
I THINK AS RABBIS HAVE BEEN KILLING JEWISH CHILDREN WITH HERPES, IT WILL ACTUALLY BE HARD TO REVERSE THE EXCELLENT DECISION.
Baby Dies of Herpes in Ritual Circumcision By Orthodox Jews – WHY DOES THE CHILD MUTILATOR ALSO SUCK THE BLOOD FROM THE BABIES PENIS?
And this is not the first time this has happened. It seems if you say something is ‘apart of your religion’ you get away with sucking blood from a babies penis? I mean, what the hell? Good luck orthodox Jews explaining why the motel needs to suck the blood off the babies penis with his mouth!!!!!!
New York City is investigating the death last September of a baby who contracted herpes after a “ritual circumcision with oral suction,” in an ultra-Orthodox Jewish ceremony known in Hebrew as metzitzah b’peh.
In a practice that takes place during a ceremony known as the bris, a circumcision practitioner, or mohel, removes the foreskin from the baby’s penis, and with his mouth sucks the blood from the incision to cleanse the wound.
The district attorney’s office in Kings County Brooklyn is investigating the death of the 2-week-old baby at Maimonides Hospital, but would not disclose the name of the mohel or whether there would be a prosecution.
“We are looking into it, that’s all I can say,” a D.A. source told ABCNews.com.
The 5,000-year-old religious practice is seen primarily in ultra-Orthodox and some orthodox communities and has caused an alarm among city health officials. In 2003 and 2004, three babies, including a set of twins, were infected with Type 1 herpes; the cases were linked to circumcision, and one boy died.
The mohel who performed the procedures, Yitzchok Fischer, was later banned from doing circumcisions, according to The New York Times. It is not known if he was involved in this recent death.
READ THE REST HERE.
WATCH A RABBI EXPLAIN WHY THE MOHEL SUCKS THE BABIES BLOOD AWAY WITH HIS MOUTH.
I love that they believe the saliva has elements of cleaning and antiseptic. Not in this case, you freaks. It is the 21st century. CATCH UP.
I LOVE THE NEW YORK POST. I LOVE THIS STORY, ALTHOUGH IT SEEMS OBVIOUS THE POLICE WANTED TO GET RID OF THIS GUY, AS ALL THE EVIDENCE…….
A cop says he got the shaft when he was booted from the NYPD for exposing himself to a female prisoner in a holding cell, because the penis she described couldn’t have been his.
The woman told cops and testified at an administrative NYPD hearing that “she unequivocally and clearly saw petitioner’s penis and that it was uncircumcised.”
Owen Hopper says he definitely is circumcised, but the NYPD hearing officer ignored his smoking gun evidence and found him guilty anyway.
Hopper “submitted uncontested medical evidence and proof that his penis was circumcised and had been so since petitioner’s childhood,” his court papers complain.
He was canned this past September, and is now suing to get his job back.
The alleged exposure incident happened sometime in 2010, when the unidentified woman was in a holding cell in the 19th Precinct station house on the Upper East Side. She said Hopper “exposed his penis to her and made vulgar and profane comments.”
His filing says she was “not credible” and made “various inconsistent statements” about the alleged incident, but “the key piece of evidence and testimony” had to do with “whether the petitioner’s penis was circumcised or uncircumcised.”
THIS PRACTICE SO ANGERS ME. PEOPLE GET UPSET ABOUT THE MUTILATION OF FEMALE GENITALS BUT NO-ONE SEEMS TO TALK OR EVEN CARE ABOUT MALE GENITALS BEING MUTILATED FOR NO GOOD REASON. AND WHY WHEN IT HAPPENS TO YOUNG GIRLS IS IT REFERRED TO AS GENITAL MUTILATION BUT NEVER MALE GENITAL MUTILATION? YOU NEVER HEAR IT TERMED THAT, ONLY THE FAT CLEANER ‘CIRCUMCISION’.AND THIS STORY FROM STUFFED COMPELLED ME TO POST ON THE TOPIC.
FIRST, THE JEWS SAY IT IS ‘APART OF THEIR RELIGION’. THAT IS LIKE SAYING CATHOLIC PRIESTS HAVE TO MOLEST CHILDREN AS IT IS AN ENTRENCHED PART OF THEIR RELIGION. BUT RELIGIONS NEED TO CHANGE WITH THE TIMES SO WAS GLAD TO SEE THIS IN THE ARTICLE………..
A Jewish Perspective and head of the Jewish Circumcision Resource Center website, says that many secular Jews now opt for a welcoming ceremony over a brit milah, or bris, by changing the ritual to omit the circumcision. “Many Jews are not aware that circumcision is a choice. It is psychologically easier to assume that there is no choice because it relieves the parents of dealing with the stress of making the decision and taking responsibility for it,” he said. “This is changing as more information becomes available on the Internet and elsewhere. When Jews are aware of their choice, of course, they are more likely not to circumcise.”
GOOD FOR THEM. RELIGIONS CAN GROW UP.
WHILST SOME MEESED UP DOCTORS MAY RECOMMEND THE MUTILATION OF BOYS LOOK AT THE GROUPS WHO DO NOT………..
“Considering that the Royal Australasian College of Physicians, the British Medical Association, the Canada Pediatric Society, the South African Medical Association, the Royal Dutch Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics and medical authorities in Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Finland are all either against circumcision or do not recommend it, the evidence points clearly in the other direction,” Darby noted.
THE WHOLE ‘WE WANT HIS PENIS TO LOOK LIKE HIS FATHERS PENIS IS JUST STRANGE AND SAD. SO THE DAD GOT MUTILATED SO LET’S CARRY ON THE PRACTICE??? AWFUL. AND WHY ARE FATHERS AND SONS HAVING SWORD FIGHTS ANYWAY?
HYGIENE? SOME PARENTS THINK IT IS HARD TO CLEAN A UNCUNT PENIS. THAT SEEMS TO BE THEIR ISSUES WITH COCK RATHER THAN ANY REAL PROBLEM. FOR MEDICAL REASONS SOMETIMES IT IS NECESSARY BUT NOT VERY OFTEN.
BUT THE BIGGEST DIFFERENCE IS UNCUT MEN HAVE BETTER ORGASMS AND THE PENIS RECIEVES FAR MORE PLEASURE WHEN IT IS UNCUT….
While professor Morris claims sexual pleasure “is either the same or better when circumcised”, Darby acknowledges that while it’s notoriously subjective, there’s plenty of evidence that it reduces functionality of the penis. A recent Danish study discovered that circumcised men have a threefold risk of experiencing delayed orgasm and their female partners are twice as likely to be sexually frustrated.
“Not only does the foreskin contain the vast bulk of the pleasure-sensing nerves of the penis, but it provides a gliding action that facilitates and enhances sexual activity of all types,” he said. “Before the 20th century it was well understood that the foreskin was the sexually dynamic and responsive component of the penis, which is why Victorian purity and anti-masturbation campaigners were so keen to cut it off.”
PERSONALLY I HAVE SEEN THIS IN MY EXPERIENCE. I WATCH WATCHING UNCUT MEN CUM. IT IS AMAZING AND OBVIOUSLY A FAR MORE INTENSE EXPERIENCE THAN FOR CUT MEN. YES, I AM CUT. AND IT FUCKS ME OFF EVERYDAY.
I AM GLAD THE PRACTICE IS DYING OUT AND IF YOU GET INTO A DISCUSSION ABOUT IT FOLLOW THIS LINK AND WATCH AN ACTUAL CIRCUMCISION AND IF THEY STILL WANT TO GET IT DONE, DUMP THEM AS FRIENDS. THEY ARE IDIOTS.