Porn Star ‘Takes Break’ From Gramps.
kliou.com
Nick Gruber, who has a nice cock, is taking a ‘break’ from Calvin Klein. The famous American designer, who will turn 70 this year, began dating Nick, a male model, in 2010 when Nick was just 20 years old.
HERE IS NICKS COCK.
rantsthoughtsmerde.com
LOOK – When Did Boxers Get Hot?
afterelton.com
HELL TO THE YEAH.
afterelton.com
MEET – Marc Jacobs New Lover – Harry Louis.
inkgdlchaz.tumblr.com
BRAZILIAN PORN STAR. WHY DO THESE DESIGNERS END UP WITH MEN WHO LOOK LIKE YOUNGER VERSIONS OF THEMSELVES? THAT IS THE STRANGE PART, AND CALVIN KLEIN IS THE SAME. SEEK HELP BOYS.
http://www.out.com/
queerty.com
Gross Closet Case Calvin Klein Throws ’21st’ For Porn Star Lover.
thequeerlifestyle.blogspot.com
Calvin Klein is throwing a bubbly bash at Indochine for his boyfriend Nick Gruber’s 21st birthday.
The fashion designer, 68, is buying out the entire restaurant for his young paramour, his constant companion since last year. According to a source, the invite reads:
“In the spirit of the New Year and in celebration of Nick Gruber’s birthday, please join Calvin Klein for dinner and drinks at Indochine Jan. 21 at 9 p.m. It will be the hottest ticket for New York’s gay and fashion elite.”
Calvin, you have never ‘come out’, and have spent most of the last 60 years n the closet, so fuck off and live your sad life out of the limelight.
You can’t have it everyway
And you boyfriend looks like your Grandson. Gross.
The Cock Calvin Likes SOOO Much, After The Jump………
Continue reading
OZ Bans Calvin Klein Billboard For Being ‘Suggestive Of Violence And Rape’.
www.huffingtonpost.com
Australia’s Advertising Standards Bureau has ordered the removal of several Calvin Kelin billboards after complaints that the image invokes violence against women, the Herald Sun reports. Psychologist Alison Grundy wrote about the issue on a popular women’s advocacy blog, explaining, “the Calvin Klein poster clearly intimat[es] the gang rape of a woman to advertise the brand.”
According to the Herald Sun, the bureau looked at the case and found, “that whilst the act depicted could be consensual, the overall impact and most likely takeout is that the scene is suggestive of violence and rape….The Board considered that the image was demeaning to women by suggesting that she is a plaything of these men. It also demeans men by implying sexualised violence against women.”
www.huffingtonpost.com
Loading ...
Comments