mjsbigblog.com

……But Lambert now disputes the nature of the recordings. Adam claims that the recordings were made for “demo” purposes only, and that in no way did Adam ever intend his alleged demos to made into an album or sold commercially.

Adam also asserts that the agreement by which the songs were recorded is flawed. But the core of Adam’s arguments concern whether or not her agreed that the recordings could be sold commercially thereafter.

Adam responds “9. … Defendant admits he executed the Music Services Agreement, but states that the Music Services Agreement was subsequently amended, and further states that Defendant effectively and justifiably rescinded the Music Services Agreement based on a failure of consideration.”

But Lambert claims that the songs were only demos and that he never intended them to be released commercially (aka on Amazon.com as an album). “Although Defendant made some recordings for demo purpose, Defendant denies he intended to perform composition for release to the public.”

READ THE REST HERE.

HE IS RIGHT TO FIGHT IT.